Can a client own my portfolio work?
The short answer
Generally, a client can own the work if the contract validly makes it work made for hire or separately assigns copyright rights. Portfolio display usually needs its own permission or carve-out, especially when the agreement also has confidentiality terms. Many agreements include a portfolio-use carve-out; many don't, and some add confidentiality terms that block even mentioning the client. Scan your agreement to check what happens to your rights before you sign.
No account requiredFile deleted after analysisNot legal advice
What ownership clauses usually do
Two mechanisms move ownership: a work-made-for-hire designation (for categories the law covers, described in U.S. Copyright Office Circular 30) and an assignment clause (a transfer of rights that works regardless of category). Freelance contracts often use both, belt-and-suspenders.
What's left for you depends entirely on carve-outs: portfolio display, reuse of generic components and tools, attribution. Silence may leave you without a clear right to reuse or display the work in your portfolio.
Why people worry
A portfolio is a freelancer's storefront. Losing the right to show your best work — or discovering a confidentiality clause that bans naming the client — directly costs future work. Designers and developers also worry about losing reusable libraries and techniques to a broad assignment.
What to look for in your agreement
- Work-made-for-hire language, an assignment clause, or both.
- A portfolio/self-promotion carve-out — and whether it needs client approval each time.
- Whether pre-existing tools, libraries, and templates are excluded from the transfer.
- Confidentiality terms that would block naming the client or describing the project.
- When ownership transfers — on creation, on delivery, or on full payment.
Questions to ask before signing
- Ask the client for a written portfolio-use carve-out if one is missing.
- Ask the other party to clarify whether your pre-existing tools stay yours.
- Confirm whether ownership transfers before or after payment clears.
- Consider having the agreement reviewed if it assigns rights broadly with no carve-outs.
Why scan instead of guess
The general rule tells you the baseline. Your agreement tells you what you’re actually being asked to sign — and the wording is what binds. Dang reads the document and flags the clauses worth reviewing, in plain English.
The deterministic engine scores and decides what’s risky. The AI only enriches the plain-English wording — AI extracts, code decides, never the other way around.
Your original file is deleted promptly after processing — we keep only the report you can read. No account needed for a one-time scan. Free preview first; full report $6.99, one-time.
Common questions
Is everything I make automatically work-for-hire?
No — for independent contractors, the Copyright Office describes specific conditions, including a written agreement and certain categories of work. That's why contracts usually add an assignment clause as well. The wording in your agreement is what to check.
Can I at least say I did the work?
Only if the contract lets you — confidentiality and non-disclosure terms can restrict naming the client or showing the work. A portfolio carve-out is the usual fix, and it has to be in the agreement.
Sources
- U.S. Copyright Office — Circular 30: Works Made for Hire (official guidance) · official source
- 17 U.S.C. §204(a) — Execution of transfers of copyright ownership (official statute text, U.S. Copyright Office, Title 17 Chapter 2) · official source
- Sources last checked 2026-06-10. Laws and market practices change — confirm current rules before relying on them.
No account required · File deleted after analysis · Not legal advice. Dang reports contract findings in plain English — general information, not legal advice about your situation. For consequential decisions, consult a licensed attorney in your state.